Project

General

Profile

Actions

Bug #8

closed

Remove internal information from docker-compose file

Added by Mad Maurice over 4 years ago. Updated over 3 years ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
Start date:
05/25/2020
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:

Description

cpp nad I discovered today that there's internal or rather information that is specific to our use case within the dockerfiles/reverse-proxy repository. We should strip the repository (including the history) of that information.

I've set the repository's visibility to internal until we mitigate this problem.

Actions #1

Updated by cpp zombi over 4 years ago

As far as I recall Paul S. set this up. I don't really see a problem with a list of some domains being published in a docker-compose file.

Actions #2

Updated by Paul S. over 4 years ago

  • Status changed from New to In Progress
  • Assignee set to Paul S.
  • Priority changed from High to Normal

If I understand this issue correctly, it deals with the domain names for various services. People can already query our subdomains via the certificate transparency project:
https://transparencyreport.google.com/https/certificates/JzsKTgV1AqtJI94TRqMBpuGT4X20mkk4u0X9omyzaSo%3D

therefore I'd argue that the list of used subdomains are not a secret.

Reclassified this as a "low" issue, but I'll be working on it.

Actions #3

Updated by Paul S. over 4 years ago

  • Status changed from In Progress to Closed

Removed the dashboard, moved tls definitions out.

Actions #4

Updated by cpp zombi over 4 years ago

The repository is still internal, since Mad Maurice changed the visibility when creating this issue. Can we change this back to public now? cc Paul S.

Actions #5

Updated by Paul S. over 4 years ago

  • Status changed from Closed to Resolved
Actions #6

Updated by Mad Maurice over 4 years ago

Change it back if you want. It seemed leaky on the first look.

Actions #7

Updated by cpp zombi over 4 years ago

Mad Maurice wrote in #note-6:

Change it back if you want. It seemed leaky on the first look.

I would if I could, which I can't. One of the owners of the repository would need to do it (e.g. you, Mad Maurice)

Actions #8

Updated by Paul S. over 3 years ago

  • Status changed from Resolved to Closed
Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF